|
It's really simple, summed up by the slogan: "Better houses, Easier on the Planet".
Our knowledge of both what makes a good building, and what it's impacts on the
environment are, has grown tremendously since 1990.
Much of the information isn't really all that new, but was ignored because
energy was cheap, materials were plentiful, no one ever heard of sick building
syndrome, and consumers were not aware that alternatives existed. While the initial impetus was driven by environmentally minded people, the
"Green building" movement has now reached the mainstream, because its
ideas make sense to many people. These main ideas are very simple,
although each has many arguments and counter arguments. Click on the link, and get our side of the argument.
Builders are finding that
green homes can bring them higher profits, and homeowners are finding the
homes to be of higher quality and having
lower operation and maintenance costs.
What about the Why Not?
The biggest obstacle in the market is lack of knowledge and
experience. No industry likes change because it means
re-learning things, but because buildings last so long, the construction
industry has a strong reluctance to try new things. Builders are
adapting the techniques, and the only way to get them is to ask. In
addition, there are numerous pioneers building demonstration projects that begin
to form the basis for change. Although there is a lot of easy things any
builder can do, you will probably have a hard time convincing them unless you
hire one who either already knows how or is willing to put in the time to learn.
The biggest impediment for many people is letting go of their notion of
what a dream house is. Everywhere you look at featured houses in the
newspaper or architecture magazines, they're always dramatically fancier than
the homes most people live in. Dream houses tend not to be as nice in
reality as they are imagined. Its not unusual to see a dream house go up
and then five years later the owners moving out to something that better matches
their lifestyle. Until recently, the entire history of architecture
focused on style, not comfort and function. People who gravitate toward
green building tend to no only want to save the planet, but value comfort, flow,
feel and craftsmanship over status.
Of course, its still possible to build a green castle. Us eco-types
will still call it an opulent waste of resources, but at least it will much
nicer to live in than a real castle (which as it turns out, aren't very
comfortable!).
Sometimes aesthetics can run counter to performance or environmental
criteria, and in this case we offer these words of wisdom:
- Every decision has some ramification - make sure its a good tradeoff.
- Most problems can be solved by being creative.
- The best solutions often come from letting go of specifics.
You can build in any style you want, but sometime stylistic elements cause
you to lose performance or increase cost. Those 18' soaring ceilings cost
money to build, but cost you floor space, and tend to collect heat. Glass
those goes floor to ceiling doesn't improve your view outside, but it does increase your heat loss. Putting a lot of glass on the west side of a
house (for example, to take advantage of a view) can lead to severe overheating
in the summer if proper precautions aren't taken.
Some people don't think the planet needs saving. Whether you
care about the planet or not, a house built using green principles will still
tend to be more durable, functional, energy efficient, comfortable and healthy
than one that isn't.
But isn't green building expensive? While it is certainly easy
for this to happen, it's just as easy to prevent it. Many things have
very little or no additional cost, and if you
factor in operation and maintenance costs, green homes often cost LESS
over time. Some banks are beginning to recognize this and are offering
improved loan terms for green homes. What will always be true, is that the
cutting edge techniques and materials will tend to cost more because they
are not widely available and don't have economy of scale production facilities.
Don't green buildings look weird? There have certainly been
plenty of green demonstration homes that do look weird, but there is no reason
this needs to be. Any style of house can modified to be a green
design--although some will adapt easier than others. The main constraint
that green building places is that the house be adapted to its climate.
Doesn't green living require sacrifice? Green homes do
encourage you to be aware of your environment and live with it, but don't
necessarily require any lifestyle changes. You can still have a TV,
microware and other electric appliances and you don't have to read by
candlelight. Homes that are designed to have an extremely low impact
on the planet do typically require some
interaction on the part of the occupants, such as closing insulating
blinds at night.
To do it right, building green
does require that you think and make conscious choices. The
result is often to educate ourselves about our impact on the environment and, in turn, its impact back
on us.
Conclusion
Green building is a rapidly changing field, and it seems likely that what we
call "green" now will end up being the standard choice ten years from
now.
Fundamentally we believe that people are intelligent, and that if they put
enough thought into it, they will make good choices. When problems arise,
if you let go of specifics, and let go of romantic notions, you can get
what you really want, just not in always in the form you originally imagined.
As more builders enter the green building market, the issue of exactly what
do we mean by green building and whether a building is green or just
greenwashing. (for those unfamiliar with the term, greenwashing refers to
something that appears green, but isn't). There is much more about this in
the green concepts section.
To learn more about green building, read the green
building section
To find out more about what's on this site, click here.
|